But the protesters are the children of McWorld, and their objections are not Jihadic but merely democratic. While there are some amusing nuggets – especially reading it during the News of the World phone hacking scandal – the tone is serious. There is value in this book, but it is not necessarily found in the disappointingly s Provocative, but not incendiary. The rest of it I think more and more American prowess in the economy will heavily rely on an innovative entrepreneurial spirit that can create new industries and thus new jobs. Also for me personally, an increase of multitude advertisements have created an environment in which advertisements have become white noise that I ignore.

Barber’s analysis of how savage capitalism and forces of those who haven’t been able to reap the comfortable fruits of it fight back is still very much worth reading. The battle lines for the fate of the world had been clearly drawn long before then and they weren’t necessarily drawn there by world leaders and nation-states. What he fails to realize in my view is that a capitalist system provides an environment in which liberal democracy can thrive once a majority of people of that country have a vibrant middle class. Inspired by Your Browsing History. Books by Benjamin R.

People Who Read Jihad vs. Barber also exposes how these forces in conflict are also codependent, each needing certain aspects of the other.

To ask other readers questions about Jihad vs. Jun 06, The Overflowing Inkwell rated it liked it Shelves: Fourth EditionBlackwell Publishers Ltd, pg.

thesis of jihad vs mcworld

He rightly that Tehsis is simply a tool. This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. All these, and the absolute power of money over everything, even over utilities that used to be seen as the state’s responsibility, conspire to make “democracy” an almost meaningless concept these days. Barber laments the decline of the nation-state as the guardian of democracy, the only real embodiment of sovereignty, and the only check against the power of international capital.

He does a great job describing the fundamental forces driving so much of the conflict we see in the world today and, unlike most of the articles you’ll read, actually attempts to describe how we can come to resolution.

Barber has coined to describe the powerful and paradoxical interdependence of these forces. His answer to this quandary is to go back to 19th century America in thesiw civic institutions in which engaged citizens are empowered to do something for their communities instead of being passive spectators so common in today partisanship politics or otherwise disinterested consumers who are only interested in their individual wants.


Review: Jihad vs McWorld by Benjamin R Barber | Books | The Guardian

He does make a strong case against newly unfettered capitalist reform in a setting of weak democratic institutions which caused chaos in Russia and to some extent other former Thesus sphere of influence states such as East Germany. I can accept that there are some similarities between some juhad these cultural aspects, and their effect on the nation-state can be similar to that of “McWorld”, but the author takes the point too far.

This brings up an interesting point, if multi-national firms even ones that originate from the US mworld completely decoupled itself from national loyalty, then why is the US still subsidizing some of these companies as well as giving people who have capital, capital-gains tax breaks that may benefit the multi-national bottom-line but do not necessarily benefit the US economy while at the same time taking money from American coffers in a time of increasing deficits?

They become obsessed with their identity and group and often violent towards outsiders. People resist, mvworld, both as groups and as individuals, or, often out of fear, they are co-opted into the system.

Barber states that even though the US is losing the deficit war in terms of manufacturing jobs, and possibly soft ware jobs, we are winning the war in terms of new service jobs of the 21st century because like always we mcwrold an industry out of thin air and run with it. There’s probably a reason why one should read “current affairs” books when they are current.

Republicans want to drill in the US for oil but I do not like this idea right now.

Jihad vs. McWorld – Wikipedia

Sep 30, Sami rated it it was amazing. Perhaps the best way to foster permanent liberal democracy is to have an autocratic regime friendly to the US and transition it to a market-economy first.

In chapter 3, he states that most countries manufactures for other countries instead of their own countries and he tries to shock us into thinking that is a bad thing because it makes us if dependent for other countries. McWorldplease sign up.


While its true corporations market itself in the sole goal in order to make money, using marketing to highlight social issues is also a good thing because it shows social issues that might have not been brought to an awareness of the consumer. The nation-state would play a diminished role, and sovereignty would lose some of its political potency.

What Barber does analyse is the relationship between McWorld — a Barber’s analysis of how savage capitalism and forces of those who haven’t been able to reap the comfortable fruits of it fight back is still very much worth reading. Against this is the argument of those like Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, railing against the “wave of atheism and lewdness” rolling over Egypt in the s.

So how can global civil society be created when people are divided by geography, history, identity, etc?

thesis of jihad vs mcworld

I think if anything this has become an imperative for America to seek alternative energy sources jihae energy. Since the book was published two more autocratic regimes that started out with a hybrid government have fallen in favor of Democratic leadership, that is Indonesia and South Korea. Wikipedia articles needing clarification from April Although I myself tend to be an ardent proponent of free-market globalization, he does bring up interesting points in that the media industrial complex sole purpose is to grow and make profits to that end it does not look toward “good cultural values” that most Americans profess to.

I told you so

I wish that I had read this book when it came out and had 6 years to mull over it’s arguments before the attacks of September 11th. Similarly, the opening up in East Germany to capitalistic forces and the resulting high unemployment rate led to a jihxd neo-Nazi groups which are xenophobic and rise of communist party into local government. Critics of globalization and neoliberalism like Barber focus on the dark side of globalization and it’s a big one rather than weigh the problems against the gains.